Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mike Smith's avatar

To this conservative, this is an astonishing comment,

"Rules and regulations designed to solve the problems of the 1970s often prevent urban-density and green-energy projects that would help solve the problems of the 2020s. Laws meant to ensure that government considers the consequences of its actions have made it too difficult for government to act consequentially. In the last few decades, our capacity to see problems has sharpened while our ability to solve them has diminished."

Green energy is a bust. Greater urban density is a bug not a feature in a pandemic. Considering that progressives have demonstrated (intentionally or not) that censorship -- to many of them -- is a "feature," I think carefully considering laws before they are passed is a very good thing.

Expand full comment
Andy @Revkin's avatar

Rob Harding sent this reaction by email:

I think it was a clear missed opportunity and failure on the part of Ezra, Derek, and Lex to NOT talk about David Leonhardt’s recent reporting on how & why progressives in America might actually win elections by listening to working-class voters and supporting a legislative reduction in the number of annual immigration admissions.

This impacts so much of what was discussed. I can’t believe it was left out of the conversation.

If you’re curious, here’s the link to Leonhardt’s article:

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/24/magazine/denmark-immigration-policy-progressives.html

And here’s Leonhardt’s thread about it on X:

https://x.com/dleonhardt/status/1894020943367807058?s=46&t=PyEFYEStUkZpv6HAc4JFbg

Expand full comment

No posts